Search for: "Matter of Simms" Results 41 - 60 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Simms does not offer any evidence that he did not tell the truth in his colloquy with the court. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Simms does not offer any evidence that he did not tell the truth in his colloquy with the court. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 11:21 am by Brad Pauley
Rule 8.520(d)(1) allows parties in Supreme Court cases to file 2,800-word supplemental briefs “limited to new authorities, new legislation, or other matters that were not available in time to be included in the party’s brief on the merits. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:16 pm by My name
  After being forced to watch the game from different seats or from the lobby on television screens, some fans are taking matters into their own hands and are suing. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 6:33 am by Michael Geist
This matter deserves to be taken seriously, but a motion that does not take this distinction into account will not help. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
After all, as he House of Lords observed in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, freedom of expression is a right without “an effective rule of law is not possible”. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Matthew Flinn
After all, as he House of Lords observed in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, freedom of expression is a right without “an effective rule of law is not possible”. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Test methods matter: representative sampling and Clean Air Act test methods can survive EPA’s credible evidence rule. 25 J. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:22 am by Kenneth Anderson
However, it received a positive (and quite interesting in its own right) review from Brendan Simms, a well-known Cambridge international relations professor, in the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Kenneth Anderson
 However, it received a positive (and quite interesting in its own right) review from Brendan Simms, a well-known Cambridge international relations professor, in the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:50 am by Pate & Brody
If District Attorney Howard Simms chooses to prosecute Seckinger, she could face 10 years in prison. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
That brings us to the issue Simms raised in appealing his conviction on the § 922(g)(1) charge, which was a federal charge Though local police initially investigated the matter, it became a federal case; a federal grand jury indicted Simms for violating § 922(g)(1). [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 2:01 pm
Simms  (1988), 33 B.C.L.R. (2d) 129, under the old rule, which permitted quite generic descriptions in favour of protecting privileged information. [read post]