Search for: "Matter of Smith v Stanford" Results 41 - 60 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am by Andrew Hamm
” At Slate, Robert Smith characterizes Scalia as “often a friend of criminal defendants,” while at Medium, Daniel Hemel analyzes recent claims about Scalia’s more “liberal” areas of jurisprudence and argues that by “exaggerating the extent to which his method mattered, we fail to appreciate the extent to which Scalia himself mattered. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Online 26 (2015)).Steven Douglas Smith, The Tortuous Course of Religious Freedom, (Notre Dame Law Review, Forthcoming).Aliza Cover, Archetypes of Faith: How Americans See, and Believe in, Their Constitution, (Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 26, No. 555, 2015).Thomas M. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Dad buys phone, gives it to kid—shouldn’t be able to get around the contract, but that’s a contract matter and not a DMCA matter. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm by Chuck Cosson
  For example, Microsoft’s General Counsel Brad Smith, speaking recently in Brussels:  “The Internet is a tool. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Smith of Jenner & Block, who argued and won Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
The resulting conversation dove deeply into key questions such as the relevance and fate of Smith v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:03 am by John Stigi
The Court’s decision in Chadbourne would appear to limit SLUSA to cases where plaintiffs allegedly purchased, sold or held (see Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
The Commission welcomed the newspaper’s efforts to resolve the matter, but upheld the complaint”. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
The defendent, Rachel Myers, withdrew her allegations unreservedly and apologised to Lady Colthurst “for the distress and embarrassment which this matter caused [the Claimant]. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
For an insightful take on the consequences of the eBay decision, read law professors Mark Gergen, John Golden, and Henry Smith’s The Supreme Court’s Accidental Revolution? [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:23 am by admin
  Not sailed so much as blown and drifting   The case is Fane Lozman v. [read post]