Search for: "Matter of Strickland"
Results 41 - 60
of 523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
Strickland v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:34 pm
(But really, I mean it’s not like Judge Perry’s law clerks or staff lawyers, or any lawyer involved in the case for that matter, would ever read my blog.) [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 1:47 pm
For instance, a modified version of the two-prong Strickland test applies when counsel had a conflict of interest (unless counsel objected to the conflict and the trial judge refused to grant a hearing on the matter, in which case yet another test is used). [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
The case, Strickland v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
The case, Strickland v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
The case, Strickland v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:54 am
29 years ago, in Strickland v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:19 am
Should the facts of this matter reveal that the business or parking lot owners failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victims may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their injuries. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 8:36 pm
He was clearly of the view that Fischel, who he noted had been used as an expert by the government and testified in over 200 matters, had been excluded. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
” Such a universal rule seems directly contrary to Strickland. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
The matter of leaving the state is a curious one. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 2:56 am
The issue is whether Ohios justice system consistently has done its utmost to ensure fair trials when the outcome is a matter of life or death. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:19 am
Should the facts of this matter reveal that the business or parking lot owners failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victims may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their injuries. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:59 am
Commissioner of Correction (Habeas; "On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly (1) denied certification to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus and (2) determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the merits of his petition. [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:00 pm
Whether the Appellate Court properly ruled that the petitioner met his burden of showing deficient performance and prejudice within the meaning of Strickland v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:00 pm
Melinda Rowe-Sullivan (NIU Law 2003) successfully argued a matter of first impression before the Illinois Appellate Court, Third District, concerning the rescue doctrine.Melinda represented the plaintiffs in Strickland v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:46 pm
The Full Court of the Family Court in Strahan and Strahan has restated the approach to be taken for interim property settlement.The wife successfully appealed against orders by Strickland J that awarded her $1 million by way of interim property settlement. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:59 am
Judge Gotschall based this conclusion on two grounds: first, that the Supreme Court itself decided the Padilla matter on its merits rather than on retroactivity procedural grounds which it could very well have done; and second, that Padilla was really an extension of Strickland that highlighted the importance of counsel informing a client of immigration consequences from a criminal conviction, a practice that has long been advocated by the ABA and other bar… [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
The negligence action against Strickland was ongoing. [read post]
