Search for: "Matter of T S B"
Results 41 - 60
of 19,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 7:15 am
If all of the above is a bit too technical for you, here’s the distilled version: Every word matters. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:02 pm
We live in a country where democracy matters, and votes count. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:28 am
Here’s my take on today’s Supreme Court decision in B&B Hardware v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Shaun B. v Taishawn B. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:51 pm
Thomas McCarthy, MCCARTHY ON TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION §§ 32:163 (4th ed. 2014)).One could say that he's talking about a defendant who has a registration ("their" word mark), but even if that's true, he's still wrong: the defendant's registration, even if it can't be cancelled, doesn't give it the "right" to use the mark "in any context. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:34 pm
The following article is written by Elaine B. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
However, B's right of priority remained with Chiesi in a re-assignment of the priority right from Vectura to Chiesi. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 1:11 pm
(T 988/02 [3.3.1]). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 am
In the grounds of appeal of 28 March 2019, the applicant referred to T 1063/18 which decided that Rule 28(2) is in conflict with Art.53(b) as interpreted by the Enlarged Board in G 2/12 and G 2/13 and that the refusal in that case based on Rule 28(2) should be set aside. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:30 am
§8.01-335(B) on a matter of first impression. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Addressing Petitioner's allegations of violation of Civil Service Law §75-b, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's action, explaining that "claims under CSL 75-b are committed to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Claims," citing Article VI, §9 and the Court of Claims Act §§ 8-9. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Addressing Petitioner's allegations of violation of Civil Service Law §75-b, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's action, explaining that "claims under CSL 75-b are committed to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Claims," citing Article VI, §9 and the Court of Claims Act §§ 8-9. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Addressing Petitioner's allegations of violation of Civil Service Law §75-b, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's action, explaining that "claims under CSL 75-b are committed to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Claims," citing Article VI, §9 and the Court of Claims Act §§ 8-9. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
Addressing Petitioner's allegations of violation of Civil Service Law §75-b, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's action, explaining that "claims under CSL 75-b are committed to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Claims," citing Article VI, §9 and the Court of Claims Act §§ 8-9. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Ryan B. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:38 am
However, I do follow the NLRB dockets and the matter Zubba, LLC d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship caught my attention. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:38 am
However, I do follow the NLRB dockets and the matter Zubba, LLC d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship caught my attention. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
Various members of the IPKat's human team were at the 2010 CLT IP Conference earlier today, and IPKat helper David Pearce gave a presentation on where we are now with patentable subject matter in Europe. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:01 pm
On August 9th, Attorney B responded to a defense question about the neuropsychologist’s curriculum vitae and said that the specialist couldn’t appear for deposition on the 14th. [read post]
