Search for: "Matter of T S B"
Results 41 - 60
of 19,484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 6:40 pm
We’re confident that FTC will file another amicus brief at the appellate court, which doesn’t bode well for the future of listing device patents in the Orange Book, as the District Court makes clear that the FTC’s position is compelling. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:29 am
” This omission of the phrase, “as it existed in 2013,” is not just a matter of semantics—it is significant because Rule 9792.9.1 was amended and the amended version is applicable to dates of injury on or after January 1, 2013, which includes applicant’s case. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
In Canada, nearly half of women and a third of men have experienced intimate partner violence and rates are on the rise.[1] What was once thought to be a private matter is now properly recognized for its widespread and intergenerational effects. [2] The issue before the court is not whether intimate partner violence exists. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Without examination of compliance with and enforcement of our rules and laws, we can’t instill the trust necessary for our markets to thrive. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:31 am
., Serial No. 90498154 (June 6, 2024) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am
Finally, the Federal Circuit notes that “[b]ecause ‘encrypted communications’ and ‘program code’ are not being claimed here for the content they communication, they are not printed matter,” and thus, “[t]he inquiry stops there; if the claim element is not printed matter, we need not consider whether it has a functional or structural relation to its substrate. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:42 am
As a result, it takes consumers more cognitive processing power and time to get from point A to point B. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
“It ain’t over ‘til it’s over. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Turning to the arguments remaining before us, "[t]he scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor* had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use" (Matter of Hudson Val. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Turning to the arguments remaining before us, "[t]he scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor* had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use" (Matter of Hudson Val. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:48 am
And don’t do it without the assistance of competent legal counsel! [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Levine’s piece isn’t about the history of the statutory presumption, or its impact, nor about the extraordinarily protracted process of its review after less than a decade on the statute books. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am
They can’t even agree what to call the Convention, much less its scope—should it address only core cybercrime, or any crime committed using technology? [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am
You’re waving a firearm around to display that it’s on your person even if you don’t intend on firing it You store your firearms loaded You transport your firearms loaded You fail to use a locking device on certain firearms when storing them Defences A strong defence to a charge of unsafe storage of a firearm will depend on the circumstances of one’s case. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 6:47 pm
Gibbs & Allyson B. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
Both (A) and (B).D. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:33 am
But I don’t want my wife’s kids to basically kick me to the door the day after we have a funeral. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Didn’t matter. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
P. 60(b)(2). 4 decisions. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
P. 60(b)(2). 4 decisions. [read post]
