Search for: "Matter of Whalen"
Results 41 - 60
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 8:26 am
The Court “assume[d], without deciding, that the Constitution protects a privacy right of the sort mentioned in Whalen v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 10:00 pm
In Whalen v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:12 pm
Citing Whalen v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
There was a five year backlog of cases, and the average commercial matter took between five and six years to resolve. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:17 am
S., at 598–599; Whalen, 429 U. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
" [Matter of Capital Newspapers v Whalen, 69 NY2d 246, emphasis supplied].In other words, when faced with a FOIL request, an agency must either provide the record sought, deny the request and indicate the specific exemption to disclosure it is relying upon justifying such refusal, or certify that it does not possess the requested document and that it could not be located after a diligent search. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:00 am
We [*2]therefore conclude that Central Valley and the Board are proper parties to this action, but we note that any responsibilities resulting from this action will be left to the Board to address by taxing only the property owners of the component district from which those responsibilities arose (see generally Matter of Locust Val. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:00 am
We [*2]therefore conclude that Central Valley and the Board are proper parties to this action, but we note that any responsibilities resulting from this action will be left to the Board to address by taxing only the property owners of the component district from which those responsibilities arose (see generally Matter of Locust Val. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 1:14 pm
State of Indiana Josef Whalen v. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 7:06 am
Judge Anderson took the matter under advisement.] [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:05 pm
That distinction matters here because there are some important differences between libertarian and conservative views on constitutional reform. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
King with nary a mention of Whalen and Cinque or even acknowledging the prior split of authority. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:56 am
” Whalen v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Windsor stressing “the federal government’s historic deference to the states when it comes to matters of domestic relations. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
’“In the words of the Court of Appeals:"Our conclusion that appellants must submit medical evidence contesting the City's physician's findings in order to trigger a hearing is also supported by the holdings, in other contexts, that due process does not require a hearing on a claimed invasion of a property or liberty interest in governmental employment, until the employee has raised a genuine dispute on operative facts (see, Codd v Velger, 429 US 624, 627; Matter… [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
"It was error to dismiss the first cause of action merely because plaintiff is not entitled to the declaration he seeks (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334 [1962], cert denied 371 US 901 [1962]); the proper course is to declare in favor of defendants (see Holliswood Care Ctr. v Whalen, 58 NY2d 1001, 1004 [1983]; Mongelli v Sharp, 140 AD2d 273 [1988]). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:26 am
Nelson, 562 U.S. 134 (2009), Whalen v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:56 am
The Constitutional Right to Information Privacy In Whalen v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:14 pm
" Wilbur Ross thinks another 400 to 500 banks might fail; Chris Whalen thinks maybe as many as 1,000 might bite the dust. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 8:32 am
Nole
APPELLATE DIVISIONTHIRD DEPARTMENTLegal Profession
Albany Firm Liable for Acts of Counsel Retained To File Claim Against Estate in Florida
Whalen v. [read post]
