Search for: "May v. Metcalf" Results 41 - 60 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 12:03 am by Melina Padron
A JUSTICE reply – Eric Metcalfe August 16, 20111 Crown Office Row Al-Skeini may open door to more war claims August 15, 2011 Melina Padron It’s (nearly) all about the riots – The Human Rights Roundup August 15, 2011 Graeme Hall Filed under: In the news [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
These constraints may seem remarkable enough but they are compounded by two further limitations that can only be sensibly described as crippling. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:50 am by NBlack
” According to Rogers,  “(V)irtualization…is only just beginning. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Ass’n, 44 S.W.3d 518, 529 (Tenn. 2001) (holding that a trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law adequately addressing each of the relevant factors listed in Hodges to arrive at the appropriate amount of punitive damages); Metcalfe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:28 am by Larry Downes
Part V will review the legal basis on which the majority rests its authority for the rules, likely to be challenged in court. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:09 pm by Berin Szoka
That’s because, per Metcalfe’s law, the value of social tools like Windows Live Messenger is proportional to the square of the number of connected users of the system. [read post]
27 May 2010, 5:02 pm by Colin O'Keefe
. - Denver attorney David Navetta on the InfoLawGroup blog The Use of Social Media in Association Governance - Denver lawyer Lindsay Smith of Winzenburg, Leff, Purvis & Payne on their Colorado Homeowners Association Law Blog Third-Party Bank Remains Caught Between an Order Compelling Production and Malaysian Law - Coercive Sanctions Recommended - New York attorney Nolan Goldberg of Proskauer Rose on the firm's Privacy law Blog Class Action Grievances In Minnesota -… [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:02 pm by Simon Gibbs
Master Campbell has previously interpreted "should" as being no more than a recommendation (see Metcalfe v Clipston [2004] EWHC 9005 (Costs) and Cullen v Chopra [2007] EWHC 90093 (Costs). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:34 pm
Master Campbell, in Metcalfe v Clipston [2004] EWHC 9005 (Costs), adopted the latter interpretation:"For [the paying party] to succeed, I consider the obligation on the receiving party to give notification of funding pre issue must be absolute but in my judgment, the word ‘should' in the PDP does not impose such an obligation. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm by Jason Krebs
This list may not include all retail locations that have received the recalled product or may include retail locations that did not actually receive the recalled product. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:43 am
To establish infringement, Oskar must "show[] that the works in question 'are substantially similar in their protected elements.'" Metcalf v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Metcalf    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0552n.06 Hussein Dia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The following list of the situation in other European countries was provided by the European Court of Human Rights in its decision to reject the UK Government's appeal against the ECHR's judgment in the case of Hirst v the United Kingdom:Prisoners may vote in 16 countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (unless serving a sentence imposed by the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), Cyprus (though they must happen to be out of prison on the day of the… [read post]