Search for: "May v. Richard et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
(citing Bowen v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
In August, The Trace presented a conspiracy about the amicus briefs filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 10:00 pm
Adams et al. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm
Richard D. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
The study itself would not be admissible, although it is clearly the sort of hearsay an expert witness in the field may consider. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Trade Comm’n, Internet Site Agrees to Settle FTC Charges of Deceptively Collecting Personal Information in Agency’s First Internet Privacy Case (Aug. 13, 1998), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press- releases/1998/08/internet-site-agrees-settle-ftc-charges-deceptively-collecting-personal-information-agencys-first. 2 NEIL RICHARDS, WHY PRIVACY MATTERS 84 (2021). [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am
Herrera, Amber Baylor, et al., Evaluating Legal Needs, 36 Notre Dame J.L. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:35 pm
Christie et al., an Iowa Supreme Court decision dismissing shareholder class action claims against directors who approved a going-private merger. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
MILLER PAUL WOOTEN, JJ. 2019-03102 (Index No. 663787/18) [*1]In the Matter of Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 100, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, et al., appellants, vCity of Mount Vernon, et al., respondents. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
MILLER PAUL WOOTEN, JJ. 2019-03102 (Index No. 663787/18) [*1]In the Matter of Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 100, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, et al., appellants, vCity of Mount Vernon, et al., respondents. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
Although lawyers are known as a querulous lot, statisticians may not be far behind. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Our Working Group’s members may write to the Commission separately on whether, as a matter of policy, the proposal should be adopted or modified; those matters are beyond the scope of these comments. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am
Amalfi et al., and how the ruling may impact former President Trump should he run for president again. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:56 am
Amalfi et al., and how the ruling may impact former President Trump. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
" —Richard Feynman[1] Earlier I wrote about certain paradoxes in data privacy that have features in common with quantum physics. [read post]