Search for: "May v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY"
Results 41 - 60
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2016, 6:04 pm
Norfolk Southern Railway Company The Georgia Court of Appeals recently addressed the application of the emergency defense doctrine to a wrongful death lawsuit arising from a series of accidents that took place on and around a railroad crossing located in Gwinnett County. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, 129 S. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
The project was beset with delays from the beginning, including problems for Boone Coleman with subcontractors and problems for Piketon in obtaining easements from adjoining property owners and issues contracting with Norfolk Southern Railway Company (N&S) to synchronize the new traffic signal with a railway crossing near the intersection. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:22 pm
The project was beset with delays from the beginning, including problems for Boone Coleman with subcontractors and problems for Piketon in obtaining easements from adjoining property owners and issues contracting with Norfolk Southern Railway Company (N&S) to synchronize the new traffic signal with a railway crossing near the intersection. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:03 am
Federal Law Preserves State Negligence Claims Ultimately, in Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm
Supreme Court’s 2000 decision in Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
Following the decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
Southern Cal. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 271 S.W.3d 76 (Tenn. 2008). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
These are petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues Title: Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:37 am
The case of Norfolk Southern Railway v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
The Court called for the views of the Acting Solicitor General this morning in the following cases: Title: Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
HolderDocket: 09-1211Issue(s): (1) Whether Section 304(b) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act is inapplicable to pre-enactment convictions of all immigrants whose convictions predate IIRIRA’s enactment, or whether the section’s retroactivity instead (a) turns on an immigrant’s subjective reliance; (b) turns on objectively reasonable reliance; or (c) is categorically inapplicable to convictions obtained at trial; and (2) whether the presumption against… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
The appeal court invoked the collateral source rule, which says damages shouldn’t be reduced simply because the victim receives benefits from other sources, such as insurance companies. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
– Enviro.BLR.com, May 5, 2010 A major railway company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged CWA and CERCLA violations for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, South Carolina. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am
The opinion below, from the Court of Appeals of Minnesota, is unpublished Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Dawn Harris-Young, EPA, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and hazardous materials laws for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, S.C., the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]
