Search for: "Mays v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs"
Results 41 - 60
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2012, 5:26 am
Fiore v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
Stevedoring Services of America, the court determined that it would no longer give Chevron deference to the Director of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Program’s litigating positions, and that employers and carriers must pay compound interest (instead of simple interest) if interest is owed pursuant to Section 14 of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. [read post]
25 May 2007, 1:03 am
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs and Electric Boat Corp. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Odegard, District Chief Judge of the Cherry Hill, NJ branch of the Office of Administrative Law Judges, District Director Theresa Magyar of the Fourth and Fifth Longshore District Offices, and the Director of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Ms. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:11 am
*************The case is Rincones v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 4:42 am
She also continuously helps employers, insurers, administrative and other service providers, their officers, directors and others to manage fiduciary and other risks of sponsorship or involvement with these and other benefit and compensation arrangements and to defend and mitigate liability and other risks from benefit and liability claims including fiduciary, benefit and other claims, audits, and litigation brought by the Labor Department, IRS, HHS, participants and… [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 10:08 am
The corrections director may carry out the director's powers and duties under this section by delegation to others.(8) Compensation, if any, for inmates who engage in prison work programs shall be determined and established by the corrections director. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Now California may be moving in that direction. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 3:25 am
In its complaint in EEOC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 11:03 am
Corporate officers are deemed by statute to be employees of the corporation. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
Based on its positive experience from a one-year pilot program, however, the IRS in May, 2015 now has implemented a new permanent penalty relief program that allows qualifying employers to resolve the Internal Revenue Code penalties for failing to file a Form 5500 required by the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
The revised legislation would still provide many workers with up to two weeks of paid sick leave if they are being tested or treated for coronavirus or have been diagnosed with it. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:45 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, and the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:58 pm
Under the rule, federal contractors and subcontractors may not fire or discriminate against employees for discussing, disclosing, or inquiring about their own pay or that of their co-workers. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am
Davis v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:05 am
Director, Office of Worker’s Compensation Programs, 354 F.3d 1085, 1092 (9th Cir. 2004) (holding DBA applied to injuries sustained by employee in bar fight on Johnston Atoll since “horseplay of the type that occurred here is a foreseeable incident of one’s employment on the atoll”); but see Gillespie v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 10:13 am
“The rule adopted today will mean that long debunked stereotypes will not keep workers from getting a new job or a promotion,” said DOL Women’s Bureau Director Latifa Lyles. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:22 am
In addition, the proposal would not cover: (1) educational institutions; (2) almost all construction contractors; (3) state and local governments; and (4) possibly TRICARE subcontractors (given the five-year moratorium on enforcement of the obligations related to affirmative action programs and recordkeeping of all TRICARE subcontractors set forth in Directive 2014-01, effective May 7, 2014). [read post]
