Search for: "Mays v. State Farm"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2013, 12:02 pm
” Shatto v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:05 am
But in a 2009 ruling, Caperton v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 4:56 pm
a procedure to comply with the enforcement procedures under subsection (e) of the Farm Bill; v.) [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 4:56 pm
a procedure to comply with the enforcement procedures under subsection (e) of the Farm Bill; v.) [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:15 am
Kodrin v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:15 am
Kodrin v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:05 am
But in a 2009 ruling, Caperton v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:20 am
Lease Terms Iowa State University’s Ag Decision Maker provides several sample leases and supplementary provisions parties can use to create a farm lease. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 11:56 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 11:56 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 11:49 am
Before getting into the specifics of Anderson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:27 am
Otherwise, the grant merely expresses the grantor's confidence that the grantee will use the property so far as may be reasonable and practicable to effect the purpose of the grant.The Will did not include language indicating that, if the State did not comply with the farming provision, the grant to the State would become void and revert to Hinebaugh. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:12 pm
On May 14, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Hall v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
Conservation Active farmers may be able to presently deduct the cost of conservation practices implemented as part of an NRCS-approved (or comparable state) plan. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 10:28 pm
” Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
Response: Because Karl is a cash rent landlord who does not materially participate in the farming activities, he may not take advantage of the IRC §175 deduction. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
Response: Because Karl is a cash rent landlord who does not materially participate in the farming activities, he may not take advantage of the IRC §175 deduction. [read post]
