Search for: "Mays v. US Postal Service" Results 41 - 60 of 494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2012, 4:35 am by Peter Bert
Wikipedia’s German entry for Loriot depicted, inter alia, postal stamps with Loriot cartoons. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Venkat
" Does it make sense to rely on postal mail--that someone may or may not come across, or pick up--while discounting a tool that most of the population uses on a somewhat regular basis? [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
If the state of destination does not allow transmission by postal channels, or alternate means of service under Article 19, the plaintiff may be in a difficult spot, since use of the central authority almost certainly would not result in adequate notice in sufficient time to be useful.What is the answer from the plaintiff’s perspective? [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, in which the court held that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act, for this blog. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
” Member countries of the Universal Postal Union or their “designated operators” “may agree with each other to participate in” electronic mail service. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 1:04 pm
It was not possible to read down the Act, nor the CrPR 2005, to provide for a convenient way to close what may well become a well used loophole. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:33 am
Last month, in a case involving Steven Warshak--the founder of the company that distributed the "Enzyte" brand of male sexual performance enhancers--a federal court ruled that email stored on an Internet service provider's server is entitled to the same amount of privacy as postal mail and telephone calls. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:35 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Informed Delivery The United States Postal Service will complete its roll out of Informed Delivery in 2017. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:02 pm by Ronald Mann
The question for the justices is whether the Postal Service (or other agencies of the federal government) is a “person” entitled to use those procedures. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm by Adam Thierer
Postal Service simply can’t absorb the losses associated with expanded postal subsidies. [read post]