Search for: "McCoy v. Feinman"
Results 41 - 60
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2011, 2:29 am
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 N.Y.3d 438, 442 (2007), quoting McCoy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:55 am
A plaintiff seeking to recover damages for legal malpractice must prove that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302; Biberaj v Acocella, 120 AD3d 1285, 1286). [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:11 am
A plaintiff seeking to recover damages for legal malpractice must prove that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302 [2002]; Biberaj v Acocella, 120 AD3d 1285, 1286 [2014]). [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am
Feinman, 99 N.Y.2d 295, 301 [2002], quoting Ackerman v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
To establish a claim to recover damages for legal malpractice, "a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney 'failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession' and that the attorney's breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages" (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy… [read post]
26 May 2020, 4:30 am
“”In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession’ and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, quoting McCoy v… [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:01 am
” (McCoy v v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
(See McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002).) [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
(See McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002).) [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:09 am
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438 (2007), quoting McCoy v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am
Contrary to the Meighan defendants' contention, inasmuch as the plaintiff did not sustain "actionable injury" until this Court awarded the buyers specific performance in the underlying action, the plaintiff's legal malpractice cause of action against them was not time-barred (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; see Kerbein v Hutchison, 30 AD3d 730, 732). [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:59 am
" McCoy v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:54 am
Further, contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the legal malpractice cause of action did not accrue at the time that the IRS conducted its audit in 2009. [*3]Therefore, the legal malpractice cause of action was not interposed within the applicable limitations period (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at 301; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
” ““A legal malpractice claim accrues ‘when all the facts necessary to the cause of actionhave occurred and an injured party can obtain relief in court’” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002], quoting Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]). [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:17 am
Here, the plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action accrued on March 20, 2012, when she, acting on the defendants’ advice, filed the bankruptcy petition (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; Tantleff v Kestenbaum & Mark, 131 AD3d 955, 956; Landow v Snow Becker Krauss, P.C., 111 AD3d 795, 796). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:34 am
From Glenwayne: “In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession’ and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, quoting McCoy… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
Contrary to the Meighan defendants' contention, inasmuch as the plaintiff did not sustain "actionable injury" until this Court awarded the buyers specific performance in the underlying action, the plaintiff's legal malpractice cause of action against them was not time-barred (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; see Kerbein v Hutchison, 30 AD3d 730, 732). [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
A plaintiff seeking to recover damages for legal malpractice must prove that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302). [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:25 am
“Accrual is measured from the commission of the alleged malpractice, when all facts necessary to the cause of action have occurred and the aggrieved party can obtain relief in court” (Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d 159, 164; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301). [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:27 am
Gilbert 8 NY3d 933 934 (2007); McCoy v. [read post]
