Search for: "McDonald v. State of California" Results 41 - 60 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2013, 8:21 am by Lindsay Griffiths
    The new year comes with minimum wage increases from McDonald Hopkins: McDonald Hopkins reviews the state minimum wage increases that come into effect in 2013. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:04 pm
So you can still get your identification card.Justice McDonald rightly holds that, sure, there may perhaps be some degree of conflict between California's Compassionate Use Act and the federal Controlled Substances Act. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 10:55 am
The article will be part of a symposium issue on McDonald v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm by Eric Goldman
How does California’s notice-based approach to privacy compare with other states and countries, and what are the pros and cons of seeking to move to a more “opt-in”-type approach? [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
  The City's best argument is a statement from the California Supreme Court in Marina, a very similar case arising from the expansion of Cal State Monterey. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:08 am
Yesterday, Constitutional Accountability Center filed an amicus curiae brief in McDonald v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:41 am by Walter Olson
” Tags: hot coffee, Prop 65 Related posts Archived food and beverage posts, pre-July 2003 (1) Yet another McDonald’s coffee style lawsuit (5) Yes, tea is hot, too: Zeynep Inanli v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:23 am by Josh Blackman
His dissent is quite similar to his McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 3:53 am by David DePaolo
Lutz injured her right shoulder, neck and back, as well as the right side of her head, right upper extremity and right lower extremity in both accidents, which involved falls at McDonald's home.The Paula Insurance Co. and the Fremont Insurance Co. carried coverage for Roto Rooter at that time, and State Farm provided homeowners insurance to McDonald. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am by Erin Miller
 Chicago officials passed the ordinance last week in response to the Court’s decision in McDonald v. [read post]