Search for: "McFarlane v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Court of Appeal hearing On 29 and 30 November 2016 the matter was heard before the Court of Appeal bench comprising of McFarlane, Davis, and Sharp LJJ. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:05 am
The concept was previously stated in Trs. of Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:53 am
The Court held that, in principle, the right to respect for private life under Article 8 can extend to the professional lives of the social worker and police officer (R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health and R (L) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:00 pm
In Eweida and Others v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
Jeremy Wright MP has been appointed as Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport following Matt Hancock’s appointment as Health Secretary. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am
This ruling represented arguably the most important family law case decided by the Supreme Court and the most significant judgment dealing with ancillary relief matters since Miller v Miller, McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
This point includes relevant text of a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Eweida and Others v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
In Hart v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
With that in mind, a secular judge must be wary of straying across the well-recognised divide between church and state. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
A notorious recent example was Lord Carey’s intervention in McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, an unfair dismissal claim brought by a relationship counselor who as a result of his Christian beliefs refused to promote gay sex. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
Perhaps also, we should reconsider the decentralization v centralization binary as a central concern for how local government actually operates. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 19 and 20 June 2018 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 11 July 2019 Sir Andrew McFarlane handed down judgment in the case of R (TT) v Registrar General for England and Wales [2019] EWHC 1823 (Fam), the case concerning the identification of a transgender male who had given birth. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm
The most notorious example has been McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, an unfair dismissal claim brought by a relationship counselor who as a result of his Christian beliefs refused to promote gay sex. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
Moore-Bick LJ added a few words of agreement, while McFarlane LJ simply agreed with Proudman J. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:53 am
State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
In R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] UKHL 3, Baroness Hale noted that Article 8 had been held to include the right to establish and develop relationships with others. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm
, Kimberly Houser, Oklahoma State University and Gregory Voss, Toulouse Business School Privacy, Ignacio Cofone, NYU School of Law Next Week in the Courts On 30 July 2018, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) will hand down judgment in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers, (heard 19 and 20 June 2018). [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
The winds of change On 29 October 2021, Sir Andrew McFarlane, the President of the Family Division, published a Report entitled “Confidence and Confidentiality: Transparency in the Family Courts”. [read post]
