Search for: "McKenzie v. McKenzie" Results 41 - 60 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2009, 1:28 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Devoy v William Doxford & Sons Ltd & Ors [2009] EWHC 1598 (QB) (21 July 2009) Azaz v Denton & Anor [2009] EWHC 1759 (QB) (21 July 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Howell & Ors v Lees-Millais & Ors [2009] EWHC 1754 (Ch) (17 July 2009) National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc v McKenzie Harbour [...] [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 7:15 am by centerforartlaw
McKenzie et al., No. 1:18-cv-04438 (S.D.N.Y. filed on May 18, 2018). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:46 am by JT
McKenzie v Abrahams, 2010 NY Slip Op 03081 (2d Dept. 2010) “To establish liability in a medical malpractice action, a plaintiff must prove a departure from the accepted standard of medical care and that such departure was a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries (see Flanagan v Catskill Regional Med. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:00 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) McKenzie v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1550 (23 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) County Leasing Ltd v Quotepool Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 705 (23 June 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Paddico (267) Ltd v Kirklees Metropolitan Council & Ors [2011] EWHC 1606 (Ch) (23 June 2011) High Court (Admiralty Division) Samco Europe, The Owners or Charterers of the Ship v MSC Prestige, The Owners or Charterers of the Ship… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:15 pm by Eugene K. Connors
McKenzie-Fiumara recently wrote a client alert regarding the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:52 am
Supreme Court ruled against the government's most aggressive use of the 'aggravated identity theft' statute, in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:14 am
  Many will recall that Paul acted in the famous L’Oréal v Bellure (C-487/07) "smell-a-like" case at the ECJ (as it then was). [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 2:42 pm by Giles Peaker
I’m not going to go into detail on Gateway Holdings (NWB) Ltd v McKenzie & Anor (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES) [2018] UKUT 371 (LC) but it does set out a point of principle. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:21 am by James Eckert
In People v McKenzie (#133 decided 6/26/12) the Court held that, in determining whether to charge Extreme Emotional Disturbance in a homicide trial, "the relevant inquiry was whether the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, presented a triable question, we believe that the issue of the reasonableness of defendant's explanation should have been put to the jury. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:54 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Writ of error coram nobis — Sentence modification This case is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of error coram nobis in which appellant sought leave to file a belated motion for reconsideration of his sentence. [read post]