Search for: "McKeon v McKeon" Results 41 - 57 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2010, 3:48 am
Confidentiality of police recordsBaez v City of New York, NYS Supreme Court, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]A number of law enforcement agencies have procedures similar to those of the New York City Police Department Patrol Guide Section 118-9, which compels an officer to participate in an interview process coupled with the promise that the statement provided by the officer will not be used against him or her in any criminal proceeding. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am by Jon L. Gelman
., III as Primary Sponsor Moriarty, Paul D. as Primary Sponsor Egan, Joseph V. as Co-Sponsor Diegnan, Patrick J., Jr. as Co-Sponsor Vas, Joseph as Co-Sponsor 1/15/2009 Introduced, Referred to Assembly Labor Committee 1/26/2009 Reported out of Assembly Committee, 2nd Reading 5/21/2009 Passed by the Assembly (76-0-0) 5/21/2009 Received in the Senate without Reference, 2nd Reading Statement - ALA 1/26/09 - 1 pages PDF Format HTML Format Introduced - 3 pages PDF Format HTML Format Committee… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 6:24 am
In the words of concurring the Appellate Term, First Department's Presiding Justice McKeon, "a question asked is often as powerful as a question answered. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Cambridge Dev., LLC v Staysna   [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:58 pm
McKeon [1986] 1 WLR 1007 and Lambeth London Borough Council v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:25 am
 That, in our opinion, would prove to be a completely unworkable standard.To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: 3657 Realty Co., LC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:51 am
-McKeon (PDF 6.10 MB)Letters Requesting Earmarks and Certifying That Those Earmarks Comply With Ethics Rules as Required by House Rules (Text is Searchable)12/04/2007 Certification Letters for the Defense Appropriations Act Fiscal 2008, H.R. 3222 -- Reps. [read post]