Search for: "McMahon v. McMahon" Results 41 - 60 of 402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2013, 7:17 am
  The defendant's argument was based principally on Burndy Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:28 am
Successor union’s liabilityParker v Metropolitan Trans. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 11:48 am
Judge McMahon has denied the RIAA's motion to dismiss its case against Patti Santangelo without prejudice in Elektra v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:47 am
McMahon [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports.]Camille Delsante was serving her probationary period. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:01 am
Evaluating the credibility of a witness in a disciplinary actionJackson v McMahon, 275 AD2d 546The Appellate Division upheld the disciplinary determinations and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of State Police on four troopers who were found guilty of misconduct and neglect of duty after being found sleeping in their patrol cars while on duty at about 3:30 in the morning.The troopers had stopped the two patrol cars in which they were riding to set up radar surveillance during… [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Court of Appeals held in Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, although "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure," in this instance an affirmation of the Village Attorney demonstrating a valid basis for the denial of the Freedom of Information [FOIL] request at issue by establishing that the records sought therein were exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i) and thus… [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Court of Appeals held in Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, although "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure," in this instance an affirmation of the Village Attorney demonstrating a valid basis for the denial of the Freedom of Information [FOIL] request at issue by establishing that the records sought therein were exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i) and thus… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm by MBettman
Teaford, Assistant Attorney General, Columbus, for Appellee, Tax Commissioner of Ohio Here are Professor McMahon’s Observations On The Oral Argument Cincinnati Reds, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:24 am by MBettman
Guest Post by Professor McMahon On November 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Cincinnati Reds, L.L.C. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:48 am
The Alabama Supreme Court took this issue on in a personal injury claim with a wantonness count in the ongoing Yamaha Rhino litigation in McMahon v. [read post]