Search for: "McNeely, Matter of" Results 41 - 55 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2015, 6:55 pm by Theodore Harvatin
The Williams court explained that McNeely only reinforced this holding. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:23 am by Mike Worgul
No matter your specific situation, contact us today to discuss how to deal with a DUI the right way. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 5:44 pm by Theodore Harvatin
He explained, matter-of-factly, that if a blood test reveals marijuana in the body of a person who does not possess a medical marijuana license, he or she will be imprisoned. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
Symczyk, in which it held that the respondent’s suit was appropriately dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction when she had rejected petitioners’ settlement offer, as she had no personal interest in representing putative claimants. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:42 am by Steve Hall
Bredesen: I think it’s just a matter of I’ve looked at it. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:34 pm by Orin Kerr
That “factor” already matters under the exigent circumstances doctrine, and it is not based on a generalized notion of seriousness but rather the threat posed based on the specific facts and circumstances. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:25 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
McNeely, rejecting the proposition that states may routinely compel drivers to submit to a blood test in drunk-driving cases without consent and without a warrant. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:31 pm by LundgrenJohnson
  The Hunn matter is still in the briefing stage and oral argument has yet to be scheduled as of the date of this article. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:21 pm by CDT
Q: Scott McNeely famously said: "Privacy is dead, get over it. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 10:15 am by Shea Denning
As a practical matter, in North Carolina breath and blood are the only bodily substances that currently are collected for testing by the State in implied consent [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:40 am by Wolfgang Demino
Unchallenged findings of fact do not bind us when "the contrary is established as a matter of law, or if there is no evidence to support the finding. [read post]