Search for: "Mcdonald v. Johnson*" Results 41 - 60 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Two employees of a nearby Wal-Mart saw the men leave the McDonald's. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:10 am by John McFarland
Three amicus briefs have been filed in support of the Hyders, opposing Chesapeake’s motion for rehearing of the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Chesapeake v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the process, the divergent conclusions in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262 (28 March 2007) and the earlier Irish case ofCollins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) (interpreting the frankly odd section 7 of the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)) were rejected. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 46 [week ending on Sunday 17 May] – Whyte & MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Dolce Co Invest Inc | "Three aspects of information: Current issues in trade secrets, client confidentiality and privilege" -- a new event | CJEU upon distribution right in Dimensione Direct Sales srl and Michele Labianca v Knoll International SpA| UK Supreme Court on Mere reputation and… [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:37 pm by Nate Russell
Another potato merchant’s skirmish at the gates of the English language occurred in 2007 when McDonald’s tried to purge “McJob” from the dictionary. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Jani
Ihalainen LLP (I'm a dreamer, what can I say), but should your name conflict with a well-known brand, such as McDonald's, the use of your own name can be tricky. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:05 pm by S2KM Limited
" These "negative" forces include predicted secondary market "chaos" resulting from the Washington Square v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of McDonald v Australian Broadcasting Corporation ([2014] NSWSC 1472) McCallum J struck out a small part of the defendant’s defence in a libel claim brought by a disgraced former Labor minister. [read post]