Search for: "Memorandum of Law by Amicus Curiae" Results 41 - 60 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2014, 7:45 am by Wells Bennett
” This memorandum provides background on the limits of military commission jurisdiction and explains why the charged events fall outside the scope of the lawful jurisdiction of the Guantánamo tribunals. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:56 pm by Mark Murakami
Disclosure:  we represent amicus curiae Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence in the district court and at the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:44 pm by Frances Rogers
  Amicus Curiae briefs were filed by the State of California, the California State Association of Counties, and the California Special Districts Association. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
Code § 2703(d), the court `asked the Federal Defenders of New York, Inc. to appear as amicus curiae. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:54 am by Courtney Minick
It’s interesting to note that Attachment A is a memorandum opinion from the FISC, previously unpublished. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
We were, and remain, very concerned about the abuse of trademark law to chill critical speech and other expression protected by the First Amendment, and appeared as an amicus curiae in several cases involving these issues: In Jenzabar, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
We were, and remain, very concerned about the abuse of trademark law to chill critical speech and other expression protected by the First Amendment, and appeared as an amicus curiae in several cases involving these issues: In Jenzabar, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
§ 2254 (Dkt. 1); the response filed in opposition thereto (Dkt. 7); Petitioner’s Reply (Dkt. 11); the parties’ Supplemental Memoranda (Dkts. 25, 31, 36); and the Amicus Brief filed in support of Petitioner. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm by Ray Beckerman
Tabora, a bittorrent download case in Manhattan, the defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that no copyright registrations had been filed for the films in issue, and that plaintiff's third claim -- for 'negligence' -- is preempted by the Copyright Act.The Electronic Frontier Foundation has filed an amicus curiae brief supporting dismissal of the 'negligence' claim on preemption grounds.ComplaintDefendant's Memorandum of… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:46 am by Daniel E. Cummins
For full disclosure purposes, I note that I wrote the amicus curiae brief for the Pennsylvania Defense Institute in this matter. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Provisions relating to certain items.- Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of this Code relating to cots, the Court may award costs in respect of, - (a) expenditure incurred for the giving of any notice required to be given by law before the institution of the suit; (b) expenditure incurred on any notice which, though not required to be given by law, has been given by any party to the suit to any other party before the institution of the suit; (c)… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:33 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Brief of Amicus Curiae Audible Magic Corporation in Support of Neither Party (12/10/2010) ñ The purpose of this brief is to inform the court of the proper purpose and use of Content ID Technology, a view that the district court clearly misunderstood, and that use of Audible Magic's Content ID Technology in the market is robust, scalable and accurate. (17) ñ Audible Magic is a privately held company founded in 1999, that… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
[footnote 3] [Footnote 3:] Indeed, in the accompanying motions for leave to file these amicus briefs, the statement of amici interest specifically lists ACLU/SC as an affiliate of an amicus curiae. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Because proponents filed their motion to stay before the court issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law, proponents do not in their memorandum discuss the likelihood of their success with reference to the court's conclusions. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-7 (Huntington, WV)Moving affidavit*Moving memorandum of law*RIAA opposition*Movant's reply memo*RIAA surreply memo*April 14, 2008, Order of Magistrate Judge denying motion to quash*Arista v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
Sumner and Jeremy Lateiner for Consumer Attorneys of California as Amicus Curiae for Plaintiff and Appellant. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:28 pm by Kurt J. Schafers
They (along with the SEC as amicus curiae) urged the court to adopt a “creator standard” and hold that a defendant can be liable for creating a false statement that investors rely on, regardless of whether that statement is attributed to the defendant at the time of dissemination. [read post]