Search for: "Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. United States"
Results 41 - 51
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2011, 9:00 am
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 541 U.S. 95, 108 n. *(2004) (5) 37 La. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
” “Dexter Lehtinen, right, a lawyer for the Miccosukee Tribe, whose members live in the Everglades, called the proposed deal with United States Sugar a death warrant for the Everglades. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:59 pm
Three case studies are presented, including the restoration of the Everglades wetland ecosystem (as considered by the United States Supreme Court in 2004 in South Florida Water Management District v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am
Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission IndiansDocket: 10-330Issue(s): (1) Whether a state demands direct taxation of an Indian tribe in compact negotiations under Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, when it bargains for a share of tribal gaming revenue for the State's general fund; and (2) whether a court exceeds its jurisdiction to determine the State's good faith in compact negotiations under Section 11 of the Indian… [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
United States and its progeny? [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:02 am
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, that transfer of water within a single body of water cannot constitute a “discharge” for purposes of the Act. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, that transfer of water within a single body of water cannot constitute a “discharge” for purposes of the Act. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 pm
The principles of federal preemption are rooted in the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:13 pm
Opinion in CBD v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
