Search for: "Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. United States"
Results 41 - 51
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2011, 8:56 am
Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission IndiansDocket: 10-330Issue(s): (1) Whether a state demands direct taxation of an Indian tribe in compact negotiations under Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, when it bargains for a share of tribal gaming revenue for the State's general fund; and (2) whether a court exceeds its jurisdiction to determine the State's good faith in compact negotiations under Section 11 of the Indian… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:00 am
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 541 U.S. 95, 108 n. *(2004) (5) 37 La. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:29 am
United States (Granted )Docket: 10-6549Issue(s): Validity of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act and its implementing regulations Certiorari stage documents:Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Petitioner's replyResponse to Solicitor General's letterLetter from the Solicitor General Call for the views of the Solicitor General: Title: Miccosukee Tribe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
” “Dexter Lehtinen, right, a lawyer for the Miccosukee Tribe, whose members live in the Everglades, called the proposed deal with United States Sugar a death warrant for the Everglades. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:48 pm
The decision in Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:55 pm
South Florida Water Management District, Case No. 3D09-2357, and Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:47 pm
See Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:05 pm
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:59 pm
Three case studies are presented, including the restoration of the Everglades wetland ecosystem (as considered by the United States Supreme Court in 2004 in South Florida Water Management District v. [read post]