Search for: "Michael Myers v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Center, 513 N.E.2d 387, 393 (Ill. 1987). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:57 pm
United States back to the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
The resurgence of secularism: hostility towards religion in the United States and France. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Walton, Judge, The United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaClosing remarks4:15-4:30 p.m. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Circuit’s al-Bihani v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
Myers Supply (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court W D Washington grants TRO against trademark infringement plaintiff: Medical Communications Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
Myers v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
United States, must come from the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:44 am
Freeman, Fealy and Myers did not. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 1:09 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Concepcion (Federal Arbitration Act preemption of California rule that a waiver of class arbitration in a consumer contract may be unenforceable) Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: Lupin v Abbott Labs: (FDA Law Blog), Plavix (Clopidogrel) – US: Apotex sues FDA to recover 180-day exclusivity on generic Plavix: (Orange Book Blog), Plavix (Clopidogrel) – US: Former Bristol-Myers Squibb executive charged over lying about Plavix deal struck with rival Apotex: (Managing Intellectual Property), Risperdal (Resperidone) – US: Apotex files motion to intervene in relisting of Risperdal patent case; Teva quickly files… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
He focuses on Justice Stevens' and Scalia's dissents in the dismissal of the certified question in United States v. [read post]
