Search for: "Mike McGinnis"
Results 41 - 53
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
In contrast, Mike Rappaport and John McGinnis purport to reject the distinction altogether. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:58 am
Mike Ramsey and I put the conference together, and let me tell you, running it required an enormous amount of work. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 7:12 am
Gwinnett Daily Post A judge will consider consolidating two cases involving a controversial land deal to buy property for the McGinnis Ferry Road extension. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
Mike Wilkins, Preamble (1987). [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:24 am
Accordingly, I very much hope that in choosing a Supreme Court nominee from otherwise attractive candidates, President Obama places some weight on writing ability.Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
3 May 2009, 9:02 pm
The orthodox conservative view is succinctly (albeit nastily) expressed by Northwestern Law Professor John McGinnis in this article in the National Law Journal. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 7:56 pm
JOHN MCGINNIS WRITES: "How about a little more detail on your video production setup? [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 1:56 pm
Borrowing from Gary Lawson and from John McGinnis and Mike Rappaport, Ed argues that we are not interested simply in the psychological states-- intentions and expectations-- of people who lived at the time of the adoption of a particular constitutional text (we must remember that different parts of the Constitution were adopted at different times.). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:06 pm
Mike Paulsen has a provocative post on Balkinization explaining why adherence to constitutional precedent is squalid. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 11:38 am
You can already get many of the articles on SSRN: Jack Balkin: Abortion and Original Meaning Randy Barnett: Underlying Principles Ethan J Leib: The Perpetual Anxiety of Living Constitutionalism Mitchell Berman: Originalism and Its Discontents It is a fun group of papers -- and others are expected from Mike Rappaport (with co-author John McGinnis), Mike Paulsen, Sandy Levinson, and Dawn Johnsen. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:45 am
One aspect of my paper with John McGinnis on supermajority rules and originalism bears emphasis: the paper attempts to explain why the Constitution is great. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 5:39 pm
MIKE RAPPAPORT AND JOHN MCGINNIS WRITE in defense of originalism. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:01 am
If one believes, for example, that the Constitution is binding because it was adopted by representatives of the people under supermajority rules (as John McGinnis and I have argued), one would also be concerned with the method of interpreting the Constitution. [read post]
