Search for: "Miller v. Department of Corrections"
Results 41 - 60
of 328
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statement since our last Round Up: 00565-21 Tatton v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation. 00394-21 Pelling v Metro, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction. 28673-20 Webb v The Northern Echo, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 29919-20 Hall v Express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication. 28851-20 Tomlin v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation. 27994-20 Odewale and Yadav v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 27841-20 Dainton v Bristol Post,… [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm
Transatlantic Perspectives on Extraterritoriality and Sovereignty, Hart, 2021, Oreste Pollicino, Bocconi University – Department of Law. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 10:46 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am
(See Miller v Nadler, 60 AD3d 499, 500 [1st Dept 2009].) [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS RYAN MILLER, Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment… [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm
Then in its 2012 Miller v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm
Then in its 2012 Miller v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
* Miller Industries Towing Equi [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am
One possibility is that eBay’s legal department had extraordinary talent. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
The EPC has no explicit provision preventing double patenting by the same applicant of the same invention; not by two applications filed on the same date but not connected via priority or otherwise, not by two applications filed on different dates but linked by priority (so having the same effective date but different filing date), not by by two applications filed on different dates but with the same filing date (i.e., a parent and a divisional). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:55 pm
§ 921.1402(d)(3) (Department of Corrections must give 18-month notice to juvenile offenders entitled to judicial review of sentence). [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Department of Justice and was an assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 2:51 am
R ((DN (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 October 2019 and 8 October 2019 . [read post]
