Search for: "Miller v. District Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
Planning and Conservation League, et al v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
In SNC-Lavalin America Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
" But the district court concluded that this was a statement of opinion, and we agree. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. case in which the Eastern District of Virginia Federal Court determined that a “pay if paid” clause coupled with a proper termination could defeat a Miller Act bond claim. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:20 pm
In Fischer v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:38 pm
Ct. 1530 (2015) and distinguished the issue-date focus of the classic Supreme Court case of Miller v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 1:38 am
In U.S. f/u/b/o Exposed Roof Design, LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
In Rost v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 12:24 pm
In a published opinion filed November 13, 2023, disposing of consolidated appeals, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 6) affirmed judgments denying writ petitions that sought to invalidate a Ventura County ordinance. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 6:27 am
Matsumoto v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 11:36 am
Stross v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
On October 20, 223, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 3) filed an “Order Modifying Opinion; and Denying Petitions for Rehearing and Publication [No Change in Judgment]” in Yerba Buena Neighborhood Consortium, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Marina Coast Water District v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 7:08 am
Radic v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:11 am
Secada Medical LLC d/b/a Ventris Medical, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 6:18 am
White, 718 F.3d at 306 (quoting Miller v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:37 am
Historic Architecture Alliance, et al v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Paul Miller, founding partner at Miller/Wenhold Capitol Strategies, takes issue with tying lobbyists to the Menendez case, which centers on alleged bribery by businesspeople who are not registered lobbyists. [read post]