Search for: "Millette v. Millette"
Results 41 - 60
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2015, 1:55 pm
v=w8ydBekmEOw [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:32 am
While Lord Millett in Bolkiah had explicitly stated that the assessment should not be a balancing exercise, this depended on there being a fiduciary duty owed by a solicitor to a former client to prioritise his interests. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Windsor (in part) and Arizona v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
Dabney v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 12:13 pm
26 Jun 2016, 3:24 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:23 pm
Judge Millett dissented in part because the plaintiffs demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:10 am
It is actually Judge Patricia Millett quoting her own opinion in Maloney v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 6:10 am
Special Preview: Lord Millett on Prerogative Power and Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty As mentioned above, Volume 7 of the Yearbook includes a short article written by Lord Millett concerning the upcoming Article 50/Brexit appeal (Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union). [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
Facts: This case (Crane Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:25 am
We affirm the judgment of the trial court. ") AC34059 - Millette v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
Maynard suggested an alternative basis for the Michigan law, one that Judge Patricia Millett of the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument in Samantar v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:42 am
Bennett v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:50 am
S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:34 am
On state post-conviction review, the Tennessee courts refused to consider petitioner's claim under Brady v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:53 am
Millett, a lawyer for several groups challenging the Arizona law, responded that “statements under oath in criminal cases are proof beyond a reasonable doubt” sufficient to lead to the death penalty. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
Millett of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:44 am
The Charleston Law Review, the flagship journal of the Charleston School of Law, invites submissions for its General Issue of Volume V ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER an author chooses. [read post]
