Search for: "Mineral and Royalty Owners"
Results 41 - 60
of 349
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2021, 3:12 pm
Strickhausen owns a half interest in the minerals under a tract of land in La Salle County. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
Margaret Ann Stockhausen, denied an oil company’s claim that acceptance of royalty checks by the mineral/royalty owner ratified the oil company’s illegal pooling of her property. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 10:08 am
Previous bankruptcy court decisions held that this provision did not protect royalty owners when the payor was a company not organized in Texas. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 4:07 am
Co-author Brittany Blakey In Headington Royalty, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 6:29 am
The dispute 2005: Broadway Bank, Trustee, conveys mineral interests in DeWitt and Gonzales Counties to John in fee simple. 2006: the Bank executes a correction mineral deed attempting to change the fee mineral interest to a life estate. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:23 pm
Hughes and Edwards were hired to try to locate the delinquent royalty owners so they could be served with the tax suit. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 3:08 pm
Mineral owners with new leases can add language to their lease to counteract this bill, but that is no comfort to mineral owners whose leases are already signed. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:55 pm
The mineral owner sued. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm
R.S. 31:210 has only been applied to wholly distinguishable situations involving third-party purchasers of minerals from a recorded lease, previously granted by the “last record owner,” who were unaware of the existence of a title dispute. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm
R.S. 31:210 has only been applied to wholly distinguishable situations involving third-party purchasers of minerals from a recorded lease, previously granted by the “last record owner,” who were unaware of the existence of a title dispute. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:05 am
If established, the law permits an inference that the apparent owner has parted with his title. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 3:06 pm
Mineral interests are real property interests, and when a producing well is drilled the owners of rights to production from the well, both the working interest and the royalty owners, are subject to being levied a property tax on the value of their interests. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:41 am
A royalty interest is the ownership of a portion of a mineral resource or the revenue it produces. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:41 am
A royalty interest is the ownership of a portion of a mineral resource or the revenue it produces. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 3:10 pm
The statute says that the “payor” for purposes of liability under the statute is the first purchaser of production unless the operator agrees with the purchaser that the purchaser will pay all proceeds to the operator and it will be responsible for paying the royalty owner. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:13 pm
As anyone who reads my blog is aware, I represent only mineral, royalty and surface owners and never represent oil companies. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:42 am
Kerr-McGee, 291 Fed.App’x 626 (2008) (in which our firm represented the royalty owners). [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 10:23 am
Many Texas mineral and royalty owners are individuals who depend on their monthly royalty check to pay the bills. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:57 am
The Texas Land and Mineral Owners’ Association and the National Association of Royalty Owners-Texas filed an amicus brief in Hyder seeking clarification on how to apply Heritage Resources, but critics claim the Court’s controversial follow-up did not clarify the issue. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:57 am
The Texas Land and Mineral Owners’ Association and the National Association of Royalty Owners-Texas filed an amicus brief in Hyder seeking clarification on how to apply Heritage Resources, but critics claim the Court’s controversial follow-up did not clarify the issue. [read post]
