Search for: "Minor et al v. The United States of America et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2018, 4:36 am
Quileute Indian Tribe, et al. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm
Fresh produce contaminated during cultivation, harvesting, processing, and distribution has also been a source of hepatitis A (Butot et al., 2008; Calder et al., 2003; Fiore, 2004; Hutin, et al., 1999; Wheeler, et al., 2005). [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am
Executive Order Protecting The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States EXECUTIVE ORDER - - - - - - - PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.,… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
The United States of America argues, as an intervenor, that the PLCAA is constitutional. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
California Pharmacists AssociationDocket: 09-1158Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.Certiorari-Stage… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:03 pm
”[6] What about Plessey v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:31 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider the now infamous case, United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Culliver (09-158) - originally Conference 11.6 [involves lawyers from Akin Gump and Howe & Russell] United States Defense Department v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:01 am
McClurg et al. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
LEMARTEC CORPORATION, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
[et al.] ; edited by Junwei Fu, Jacob S. [read post]
