Search for: "Minor v. US Department of the Treasury"
Results 41 - 60
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2020, 9:26 am
Department of the Treasury also has the right to recoup payments from the insurance industry generally subject to formulas set forth under TRIA. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
Separately, and I think the government was well intentioned here that they tried to bring in terms of use that would hopefully make it clear that people could re-use content and that was supposed to be adopted across all government websites that at least for the departments th [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
This refusal was just the denial of a benefit; no-one was being threatened with jail or fines for using the name—owners of this mark were just not being given access to certain useful remedies against those who would infringe the mark. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
As a former government attorney myself (I used to work for the Department of Treasury’s Office of General Counsel for the IRS), I know how easy it is to lose sight of the fact that government attorneys have 3 clients: in this case, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the American taxpayer, and justice. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
As a former government attorney myself (I used to work for the Department of Treasury’s Office of General Counsel for the IRS), I know how easy it is to lose sight of the fact that government attorneys have 3 clients: in this case, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the American taxpayer, and justice. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
As a former government attorney myself (I used to work for the Department of Treasury’s Office of General Counsel for the IRS), I know how easy it is to lose sight of the fact that government attorneys have 3 clients: in this case, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the American taxpayer, and justice. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 11:39 am
In 1983, however, the Supreme Court’s decision in INS v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
” Walling v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
In Freeman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
To prevent a taxpayer from thwarting the sales tax by purchasing a good outside the state for use in the state, South Dakota and many other states[3] impose a complimentary use tax on the purchaser’s use of the property in the state. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
The Labor Department also says employee misclassification also generates substantial losses to state and federal treasuries, and to the Social Security and Medicare funds, as well as to state unemployment insurance and workers compensation funds. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
To understand the import of this provision, some background may be useful. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
This is a critical issue because the financial impact to the originating national bank is minor in the case of charged-off credit card debt (which is typically sold for a few cents on the dollar (of the charge-off balance) whereas the sale price for loans destined for securitization is at par with face value, or even higher. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
This is a critical issue because the financial impact to the originating national bank is minor in the case of charged-off credit card debt (which is typically sold for a few cents on the dollar of the charge-off balance) whereas the sale price for loans destined for securitization is at par with face value, or even higher. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 11:51 am
Sarah Grant summarized Judge Cooper’s opinion on motion in limine in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 7:47 am
What is clear is that the battle over Cuba policy has now moved from the Executive office of the President to the control of the regulation writing that has probably already commenced (Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Frequently Asked Questions on President Trump’s Cuba Announcement). [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit erred in holding that, although the challenged reforms did not adversely affect minority voting, the North Carolina legislature nonetheless intended to deny African Americans the right to vote; and (3) whether statistical racial disparities in the use of voting mechanisms or procedures are relevant to a vote denial claim under Section 2. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am
Michigan Department of Treasury, 16-736 Issues: (1) Whether the Multistate Tax Compact has the status of a contract that binds its signatory states; and (2) whether a state law that imposes retroactive tax liability for a period of almost seven yea [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
That brings us to our other new relist for the week: Patchak v. [read post]
