Search for: "Minority Communications Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 1,681
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2024, 6:07 pm by Mark Ashton
Meanwhile, in May 2023 Idaho passed HB71, a law making it a crime to provide gender affirming care to minor children. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
. [* * *] California Restriction on Gun Ads That "Reasonably Appear[] to Be Attractive to Minors" Likely Unconstitutional From Junior Sports Magazines, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Olkowski’s appeal was allowed in Olkowski v Nano-Green Biorefineries Inc., 2024 SKCA 11. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 26, Oct. 6, Oct. 13, Oct. 27, Nov. 3, Nov. 9, Nov. 17, Dec. 8, Jan. 5, Jan. 12 and Jan. 19 conferences; rescheduled before the Dec. 1 conference)  Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
Critics argue that the UCC encroaches on minority rights and imposes Hindu laws on other religious groups, as it closely resembles Hindu personal laws. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:47 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you to receive future updates by registering on our Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am by Karen Gullo
Apart from potentially criminalizing security research, similar provisions have also been misconstrued to attach criminal liability to minor violations committed deliberately or accidentally by authorized users. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
As discussed, Doe faces a "community hostile to the viewpoint reflected in [his] complaint. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Optum Settlement 46th Right Of Access Enforcement Settlement The Optum settlement resulted from OCR’s investigation of six complaints in the Fall of 2021 that Optum violated the Right of Access Rule by failing to provide timely access to medical records when requested by an adult patient or by the parents of minor patients. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 2:16 pm by Content Team
Snap Inc., alleges that Snapchat’s design, features, and policies have facilitated illegal drug sales, specifically targeting minors. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 4:57 pm by Steve Bainbridge
  The lead plaintiff claimed the controller caused the company to unfairly sell a litigation asset in In re Straight Path Communications Inc. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
In fact, Section 502 of the Communications Decency Act expressly authorizes distributor liability for knowingly displaying obscene material to minors. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am by Eric Goldman
Why, yes we are: Section 502 of the Communications Decency Act expressly authorizes distributor liability for knowingly displaying obscene material to minors. 47 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:04 am by Evan Brown
Snapchat’s Role in the Abuse Case Snapchat, owned by Snap, Inc., was used by the teacher to send sexually explicit material to Doe. [read post]