Search for: "Miranda v. Michigan" Results 41 - 60 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2007, 9:38 am
Daniel Katz (University of Michigan, Political Science) has posted Institutional Rules, Strategic Behavior and the Legacy of Chief Justice William Rehnquist: Setting the Record Straight on Dickerson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:16 am
On October 7, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied three applications for leave to appeal. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:45 pm
Louisiana moved back and forth between two different inquires: whether the Court should overrule Michigan v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Defendant’s statements were properly admitted into evidence.The Michigan Supreme Court declined Defendant's invitation to further review his case. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:19 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
Defendant’s statements were properly admitted into evidence.The Michigan Supreme Court declined Defendant's invitation to further review his case. [read post]
27 May 2012, 11:42 am by Madelaine Lane
  The Court also remanded People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the state, Michigan Solicitor General Eric Restuccia began by emphasizing the Court’s decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:15 pm
The Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to overrule Michigan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:11 am by Timothy P. Flynn
You remember Miranda v Arizona; the seminal criminal procedure and constitutional law case from the 1960s SCOTUS, requiring police to provide an accused suspect of his right to remain silent and to obtain a lawyer prior to answering any questions.Anyway, the Court of Appeals upheld the trial court's decision to allow the MDOC official testify about his questioning of Cortez; the questioning was characterized by the prosecutor as designed to elicit information about the gang… [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 7:05 am
The Eastern District of Michigan concludes that the Sixth Circuit will hold that 404(b) evidence is subject to exclusion. [read post]