Search for: "Mitchell v. District of Columbia"
Results 41 - 60
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
Nina Mitchell Wells Nina Mitchell Wells was sworn in as New Jersey's 32nd Secretary of State on January 17th, 2006. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected these claims on the ground that the Constitution’s speech-or-debate clause prohibits judicial review of legislative actions such as voting. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am
And in 1978, the House and Senate approved an amendment to grant congressional voting rights to the District of Columbia after hearing were held in Bayh’s subcommittee. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
That brings us to Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Attorney for the District of Columbia for prosecution. [read post]
3 Oct 2005, 2:50 am
Andersen had been an "unnamed" defendant who was being sued in federal court in the District of Columbia. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
City of Columbia, 305 F.3d 314, 323 (5th Cir. 2002) (en banc). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
An example of this can be found in Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
District Judge Tan Ikram will give a written judgement on the case on 2 June 2016. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
October 12 The US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld Judge Sirica's ruling that Nixon should surrender tape recordings relevant to Watergate. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was “wrong” in August when it reversed the drug dealer’s conviction, which was based on warrants to search and find drugs in the locations where defendant Antoine Jones had traveled. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Industrial Union Dep’t v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm
Mitchell, with fifteen minutes of time. [read post]
