Search for: "Mitchell v. Johnson*"
Results 41 - 60
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2018, 6:33 am
Peter Marcus Kristensen, International Relations at the End: A Sociological Autopsy Joshua Tschantret, Cleansing the Caliphate: Insurgent Violence against Sexual Minorities Ore Koren & Anoop K Sarbahi, State Capacity, Insurgency, and Civil War: A Disaggregated Analysis Christopher McIntosh & Ian Storey, Between Acquisition and Use: Assessing the Likelihood of Nuclear Terrorism Charles Crabtree, Holger L Kern, & Steven Pfaff, Mass Media and the Diffusion of Collective Action in… [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 10:23 am
Mitchell, 2018 U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
Raleigh Levine (Mitchell Hamline), Prof. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:20 am
The verdict in Hartman et al v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:20 am
The verdict in Hartman et al v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:42 am
As Justice Brennan noted in his concurring opinion in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
Arguing for Hawaii, Mitchell Reich noted that the Supreme Court had reviewed an earlier exercise of authority under § 1182(f) in the 1993 case Haitian Centers Council v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Gelblum, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles, California; Carey R. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 6:30 am
Here’s another volume in Hart’s Landmark Cases series that is now out in paperback: Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract, edited by Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell, both of University College London. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:21 pm
Alex Loomis posted a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Ziglar v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
Humphreys School of LawMichael Campbell, Villanova University Charles Widger School of LawErin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of LawCynthia Ho, Loyola University of Chicago School of LawDanielle Pelfrey Duryea, University of Buffalo School of Law, State University of New YorkJennifer Mantel, University of Houston Law CenterElizabeth McCuskey, University of Toledo College of LawLaura McNally-Levine, Case Western Reserve University School of LawJennifer Oliva, West Virginia University… [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am
Mitchell, Congress only had the power to change the voting age in federal elections. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Desmet, Integrated Human Rights in Practice: Rewriting Human Rights Decisions (Edward Elgar, 2017)).Katherine Pratt, The Tax Definition of 'Medical Care': A Critique of the Startling IRS Arguments in O'Donnabhain v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
This was cause for Nixon’s concern, and his scheme to block the peace talks from occurring.Per the notes, which I have translated and summarized, Nixon instructed Haldeman that Bryce “Harlow [should be] monitoring [the situation in] V[iet] Nam. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Mitchell (1972) 28 Cal.App.3d 356, 358. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:50 am
R v Mitchell (Northern Ireland). [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:45 am
R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016 Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd, heard on 30 June 2016 R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard on 4 Jul 2016 R v Mitchell, heard on 7 July 2016 AB v Her… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:19 am
R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016 Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd, heard on 30 June 2016 R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard on 4 Jul 2016 R v Mitchell, heard on 7 July 2016 AB v Her… [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:02 am
LEXIS 130983 (WD MO, Sept. 26, 2016), a Missouri federal district court upheld the prison system's failure to include "atheism" as a religious preference on intake forms, but allowed an inmate to move ahead on his claim that he was not given a sufficient opportunity for a secular alternative to the standard substance abuse program.In Mitchell v. [read post]
