Search for: "Mitchell v. True" Results 41 - 60 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2014, 7:46 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
The excessive fee cases presented this dynamic perfectly, with early decisions, such as Hecker v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 3:26 am by INFORRM
 Like the others (Rai v Bholowasia, Asghar & Anor v Ahmad & Ors, Ma v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust) this was not a case against the mainstream media. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:57 am by Susan Brenner
”   In re Mitchell W., supra (quoting In re Frank V., 233 Cal. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The elements of a cause of action sounding in fraud are a material misrepresentation of an existing fact, made with knowledge of the falsity, an intent to induce reliance thereon, justifiable reliance upon the misrepresentation, and damages” (Mitchell v Diji, 134 AD3d 779, 780 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]