Search for: "Modified Opinion filed 3/1/10"
Results 41 - 60
of 728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
The legislation can be broken down into four broad categories: 1) substantive reforms to the laws the NSA believes allow it to conduct its surveillance programs, 2) disclosure of the FISA Court opinions that determined the programs were legal, 3) general reporting of the number and types of surveillance orders received by recipients and how many users affected, and 4) reforms to the FISA Court. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 2:18 am
The main request, auxiliary request 1 and auxiliary request 3 were filed on 15 October 2015. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 4:32 am
Wife engaged in a lengthy extramarital affair and Husband filed for divorce. 3. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:21 am
None of these details can be seen in Figure 1 as originally filed. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:04 am
Silberman, 15 AD3d 167[ 1 st Dept. 2005) Further, the June 10, 2008 letter conclusively establishes a defense to the malpractice claim. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:45 pm
D3 in combination with late-filed document D7. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
The partial sequence of P1 as depicted in figures 1 to 3 (corresponding to figures 1 to 3 of the patent) encodes 544 amino acids (about 16% of the complete sequence). [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm
3. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
§ 30-3-35.1(1) (LexisNexis 2019). [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
Indiana Code § 3-12-1-13. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board found these requests to be inadmissible.*** Translation of the French original ***[1.1] Claims 1 of the main request and of auxiliary requests 1 to 3 have been amended by introducing the subject-matter of claims 5, 7, and 8 of the patent as granted (which correspond to original claims 5, 7, and 8). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:56 pm
” Rule 1.5, RPC, Comment 10. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
In this context it referred back to that passage of communication A (see section II(c) above) where, in the assessment of the requirements of clarity (Article 84 EPC), three steps, i.e. steps 1 to 3 of the second list, had been enumerated as essential features. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 3:17 pm
These ten factors, listed in §5337(h), are as follows: 1. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 5:14 pm
By order dated July 10, 1959 such judgment was amended by adding three provisions: (1) enjoining plaintiff from taking the child out of the City of New York; (2) directing plaintiff to make the child available to the defendant during the periods prescribed for his visitation; and (3) suspending defendant's obligation to make payments for the support of the child in the event that, and as long as, plaintiff should frustrate defendant's visitation rights by keeping… [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
Union of India, (2014) 3 SCC 1. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Malone), ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Apr. 25, 2012; modified May 1, 2012), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) addressed a case standing at the crossroads between Concepcion and Stolt-Nielsen. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:08 am
The DecisionIn oral proceedings, the EPO upheld its preliminary opinion that the priority claim was invalid, and that disclosures between the filing date of the US provisionals and the filing date of the PCT application were citeable against the claims. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
¶ 10. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am
With letter dated 10 September 2015, the opponent withdrew its appeal. [read post]
