Search for: "Montgomery v. Mississippi"
Results 41 - 60
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
The court’s landmark decision in NAACP v Claiborne Hardware Co. affirmed the constitutional right of NAACP activists to hold a mass economic boycott of white-owned businesses in Port Gibson, Mississippi, to protest the community’s persistent racial inequality and segregation. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm
Montgomery County, where the crime occurred, is 45 percent black. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 2:57 pm
Mississippi. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
The Sullivan Cases Abernathy v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
Mississippi, which asks whether a prosecutor’s repeated use of peremptory challenges to remove black people from the jury pool violated the Constitution, and False Claims Act case Cochise Consultancy v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:34 am
" Montgomery v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
The Supreme Court held, in the Minor v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Shanks v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:47 am
However, the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:41 am
One recent example is the case of Ash v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
• The rule banning racially discriminatory use of peremptory strikes announced in Batson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.96.A730 1993 Regenstein Baldwin, Lewis V. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Yet the words of Justice Kennedy writing for the Court in Montgomery v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
Appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1981, she would go on to write 645 opinions, including landmark decisions upholding gender equality (1982’s Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Honda Motor Co., 52 F.3d 1311, 1316-1317 (5th Cir. 1995), the court vacated a punitive damages award under Mississippi law, inter alia, because the government did not require the safety device advocated by the plaintiffs. [read post]
