Search for: "Montoya v. Montoya" Results 41 - 60 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2021, 3:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint based upon the plaintiff’s failure to demonstrate his substantial compliance with 22 NYCRR 1400.3 (see Montoya v Montoya, 143 AD3d 865; Badawi v Alesawy, 135 AD3d 793, 795; Cornish v Eraca-Cornish, 107 AD3d 1322, 1326; Wagman v Wagman, 8 AD3d 263). [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 2:28 am
Gristede's Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:11 am by Unknown
Hoopa Valley Tribe (Clean Water Act) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlSwiger v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:30 pm by Rumpole
 On Wednesday the court hears argument in US v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A matrimonial attorney seeking to recover unpaid legal fees must demonstrate substantial compliance with the rules applicable to attorneys representing clients in domestic relations matters as an essential element of his or her prima facie case (see Greco v Greco, 161 AD3d 950, 951-952 [2018]; Montoya v Montoya, 143 AD3d 865, 865-866 [2016]; Hovanec v Hovanec, 79 AD3d 816, 816 [2010]; Pillai v Pillai, 15 AD3d 466, 467… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:39 am
In an interesting opinion in an intriguing case, California's Fourth District Court of Appeal summarized the law and applied it to its summary of the facts in American Modern Home Insurance Co. v. [read post]