Search for: "Moon v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 10:42 am by Kevin Johnson
Lynch, a case involving the removal from the United States of Moones Mellouli, a lawful permanent resident from Tunisia, based on a Kansas misdemeanor drug paraphernalia conviction for possession of a sock used to hide four tablets of the prescription drug Adderall. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:08 am by Walter Olson
“The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is ‘materially indistinguishable’ from searches of [a wallet or purse] … That is like saying a ride on horseback is materially indistinguishable from a flight to the moon. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:59 am by Kevin
The published opinion I referred to in my earlier post, United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 1:06 pm
Judge Moon also denied the plaintiff's claim for preliminary injunctive relief, where the relief sought was payment of money.In Peebles v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:48 pm by Kevin Funnell
Much blathering has occurred in trade publications recently (some of the blathering expectorated by this blog's author) about the dire implications to banks of the recent federal district court decision in Experi-Metal v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 11:56 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979) (federal agency informed property owner that it could not exclude the public from a navigable marina); Loretto v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:30 am by Jeffrey Greyber
State Farm.1 On the other hand, we had the policyholder-friendly view of the Fifth District Court of Appeal – State Farm v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Brittany Blakey In City of San Mateo, et al v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hospitality and United States Immigration Law, (Vincentian Heritage Journal: Vol. 33: Iss. 1, Article 8).Richard Moon, Neutrality and Prayers: Mouvement Laique v Saguenay, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2015, 4, 512–519).Stephen M. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:20 am by Record on Appeal
  The court recognized prior Hawaii case law (Winslow v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:40 am by Paul A. Prados
  This was a mere eleven days after the filing of the Complaint.Judge Moon's opinion is here:http://www.scribd.com/doc/49679470/Carter-v-SBE-opinionJudge Moon's order of dismissal is here:http://www.scribd.com/doc/49679144/Carter-v-State-Board-of-Elections-15Feb2011-OrderThe case is not ripeFederal courts are only allowed to hear actual current controversies. [read post]