Search for: "Moore v. Cooper" Results 41 - 60 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2021, 2:58 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
ShareMythological creatures and French literary heroes appeared during argument in Thompson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:55 am by Nedim Malovic
Bad faith pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), presupposes the presence of a dishonest state of mind or intention (Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO (C‑104/18 P)). [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit erred in holding that a general principle of law announced in Moore v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
.: HPSCI will hear testimony from Laura Cooper, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russian, Ukrainian and Eurasian affairs, and David Hale, the undersecretary of state for political affairs. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Cooper, which asks whether the Constitution gives Congress power to revoke the states’ immunity from suit for copyright infringement, comes from Howard Wasserman. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am by Vishnu Kannan
Scott Moore argued that President Trump’s techno-nationalism is a mistake. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by Richard Hunt
As Bradley Cooper sings in the latest version of A Star if Born, “Maybe it’s time to let the old ways die. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Kathryn Moore has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The EFF argued that the embedding of Section 230 into NAFTA/USMCA “could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]