Search for: "Moore v. District of Columbia"
Results 41 - 60
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Columbia Pictures Indus., Inc., 508 U.S. 49, 60-61 (1993) (“PRE”). [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
Supreme Court.Not once, but twice.The latest rendition of Lozman v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Key Findings Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia had notable tax changes take effect on July 1, 2019. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
Thus even if, arguendo, federal law does not prohibit the District of Columbia from applying Crawford retroactively on collateral review, District of Columbia law does. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
See Moore-Dennis v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:38 pm
The important exception is the Seventh Circuit panel's decision in Moore v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am
In Moore v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court left by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy late last month. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:55 pm
[Footnote: See District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
Our next case is a sequel: Moore v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:18 pm
Columbia Pictures Industries (2nd Cir. 2000) 204 F.3d 326, reversing an employer's summary judgment in an ADA case; Cruz v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:37 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled the other way in 2016); and that substantively, the doctrine of Pinkerton v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:03 am
On November 29, during oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
Attorney for the District of Columbia, Thapar moved back to Ohio in 2001. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:44 am
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 8:40 am
District Court for the District of Columbia under 35 USC § 145. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 8:40 am
District Court for the District of Columbia under 35 USC § 145. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Kathryn Moore has this blog’s analysis. [read post]
