Search for: "Moore v. District of Columbia"
Results 41 - 60
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2020, 1:59 pm
MacElree v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit erred in holding that a general principle of law announced in Moore v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Kip Tom, the U.S. representative to the U.N. agencies for food and agriculture; Jonathan Moore, the principal deputy assistant secretary of state for international affairs; Scott Busby, the deputy assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor; and three non-government witnesses. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:04 am
Balbin v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:54 am
This blog is meant to publish news about the District. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is in the bar section, where she will move the admission of a group in a few minutes. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
District Judge Jed Rakoff. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
Note: The author thanks Brittany Moore for contributing to statutory research for this piece. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
In District of Columbia & Maryland v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Key Findings Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia had notable tax changes take effect on July 1, 2019. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
Smith v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Kathryn Moore has this blog’s analysis. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 11:00 am
” But, years after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
(relisted after the December 7, January 4 and January 11 conferences) Moore v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
United States, 17-7496, and Moore v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
Our next case is a sequel: Moore v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:59 am
Moore and retaliatory prosecution In Hartman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the FCC’s rules, and then denied rehearing en banc over the dissents of Judge Janice Rodgers Brown and then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
