Search for: "Moran v. District Court of Appeal" Results 41 - 60 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:05 am by R. David Donoghue
Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., Case Nos. 2008-1392,-1393 & -1922, Slip Op. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 6:40 pm by Howard Friedman
On Wednesday, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Moran v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:41 pm
[Update, Moran v Manchester CC (our Court of Appeal report here) will also be handed down on the same day as the two were heard together] We’ll have the decks cleared for those. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 4:17 am
  In Federal District Court the rule is set forth in Katz v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:04 am
" In two separate law review articles (here and here) I have argued that both the district court and the court of appeals wrongly decided the American Needle case. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:12 pm
Mar. 2, 2009), the California District Court of Appeal held that the city could not increase an in-lieu affordable housing exaction from $734 to $21,000 per house, because it failed to show the increase was attributable to the development. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:46 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITLegal ProfessionState High Court to Decide if Lawyer's Unsuccessful Attempted Deceit a Basis for Judiciary Law §487 Liability Amalfitano, plaintiffs-appellees v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:46 pm by John Wood
  The federal district court dismissed his state-law claims with prejudice and his federal claims without prejudice. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Despite the Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Gregg v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
Celestica Corp    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08b0008n.062008/04/18 In re: Robert Moran v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
On appeal, the CAFC reversed the district court’s claim construction and remanded. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:39 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITLand Use and Planning Town Leaders' Comments Showed Racial Animus In Permit Modification Vote Barring Teen Dances Cine SK8 Inc. v. [read post]