Search for: "Morris v. Commonwealth" Results 41 - 60 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2014, 4:15 am by Patricia Salkin
Morris v Franklin Township Zoning Hearing Board, 2014 WL 1273899 (PA Commwlth 3/28/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Commonwealth/out/183CD13_3-28-14.pdfFiled under: Current Caselaw, Special Use/Exception [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
  We don’t know either – although it might be so it can be considered together with another (but unrelated) qualified immunity case on for that conference, Morris v. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 12:39 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
See, http://www.cancer.org.au/content/pdf/CancerControlPolicy/PositionStatements/TCUCCVBkgrndResrchPlainPak270511ReEnd_FINAL_May27.pdf [3]http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_australia-strips-glamour-off-cigarette-enforces-plain-packaging-law_1772119 [4]The Australian Constitution allows the Parliament to acquire property only “on just terms from any State or person for any purpose in respect of which the Parliament has power to make laws”. [5]JT International SA v… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:40 am by Laura Sandwell
Morris v Rae, heard 3 October 2012. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:11 am by New Books Script
KF 352 A882 2011 Lone star law : a legal history of Texas Michael Ariens ; foreword by Gordon Morris Bakken. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionReply of petitioner Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Edward A. Fallone
Some opponents of the effort to recall Governor Scott Walker have claimed that the recall provisions of the Wisconsin State Constitution are intended solely to permit the recall of elected officials when they have engaged in criminal or grossly unethical conduct. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:12 am by Albert Wan
A few months ago, I wrote about the Virginia Supreme Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Beard, 633 F.3d 126 (3d Cir. 2011) (granting relief on Brady claim), with Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Beard, 633 F.3d 126 (3d Cir. 2011) (granting relief on Brady claim), with Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm by Graeme Hall
Chris Morris, in an interesting article for the BBC, reports that a major reason for the negative reaction to this judgment and other similar judgments is that they have emanated from international courts prefixed with the word “European”. [read post]