Search for: "Mullins v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
This may not be as well-known to those who live out on the coasts, but the United States is currently suffering through a drought as bad as any we’ve seen in some time—United States Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack recently said it was “the most serious situation we’ve had in probably 25 years. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:14 pm by Shardha Rajam & Mihika Poddar
On June 4, 2018, the Supreme Court of United States of America decided that the freedom to express religious beliefs would trump the right to equality. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:43 pm by Sheppard Mullin
District Court for the Southern District of Florida granted Revolution’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of United States Patent RE 37,545 (‘545 patent) in Aspex Eyewear, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:00 pm by Daniel C. Kloke
Kraft Foods Group Brands, No. 16-341, the United States Supreme Court significantly changed the geography where future patent infringement suits can be filed. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:00 pm by Daniel C. Kloke
Kraft Foods Group Brands, No. 16-341, the United States Supreme Court significantly changed the geography where future patent infringement suits can be filed. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
The bill would override a notable 2009 court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:09 pm
On June 9, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:28 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument in the Bilski patent case, the judicial resolution of which is bound to have far-reaching consequences on the way that the United States and the rest of the world view and treat patents (see the original transcript of the arguments here - hat tip to Kevin E. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 2:54 am
Ninth Circuit holds that absence of "Upjohn warning" does not bar admissibility in criminal prosecution of statements elicited by corporate counsel during internal investigationSheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP"In United States v. [read post]