Search for: "Munoz v. Munoz" Results 41 - 60 of 304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2019, 4:58 am by admin
Saucedo-Munoz, 307 F.3d 344, 350 (5th Cir. 2002) (limiting instruction “mitigated any danger that the jury considered the evidence improperly as proof of bad character”); United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Tucker Higgins at CNBC and Gabriella Munoz at The Washington Times. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Jurisdiction is not acquired pursuant to CPLR 308(2) unless both the delivery and mailing requirements have been strictly complied with'” (Josephs v AACT Fast Collections Services., Inc., 155 AD3d 1010, 1012, quoting Gray-Joseph v Shuhai Liu, 90 AD3d 988, 989; accord Munoz v Reyes, 40 AD3d 1059, 1059; Ludmer v Hasan, 33 AD3d 594, 594). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
Munoz v. 7-Eleven,Keep Reading this POP Post The post Big (Privilege) Gulp: 7-Eleven Protects In-House Counsel’s Emails about Background-Check Form appeared first on Presnell on Privileges. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
Munoz v. 7-Eleven,Keep Reading this POP Post The post Big (Privilege) Gulp: 7-Eleven Protects In-House Counsel’s Emails about Background-Check Form appeared first on Presnell on Privileges. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:17 am by Jason P. Wapiennik
  On Apr. 1, CBP officers inspecting outbound vehicles to be transported onboard the ferry M/V KYDON, bound to Santo Domingo, selected a Ford E-350 cargo vehicle for further examination.The driver, a legal permanent resident with citizenship from the Dominican Republic, declared being in possession of $4,000. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:06 am by scanner1
Wallace DA 17-0015 2019 MT 12N Criminal – Sexual Abuse of Children Munoz v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
Munoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P., 22 S.W.3d 857, 864 (Tex. 2000). [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of Rule 702.12 1 Brock… [read post]