Search for: "Murphy v. CIR"
Results 41 - 60
of 499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
27 May 2022, 9:32 am
In Resurrection School v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:32 pm
Two weeks ago, in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:51 am
See, e.g., IDT Corp. v. eBay (8th Cir. 2013) (finding a company's "confidential and competitively sensitive information" warranted sealing the complaint); Goff v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has inquired whether New York's " 'special duty' requirement" applies "to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence" or if it applies only to claims premised upon a municipality's negligent "failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury inflicted other than by a municipal employee" (975 F3d 255, 291 [2d Cir 2020]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has inquired whether New York's " 'special duty' requirement" applies "to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence" or if it applies only to claims premised upon a municipality's negligent "failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury inflicted other than by a municipal employee" (975 F3d 255, 291 [2d Cir 2020]). [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
A leading feature of the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:58 pm
McGirt’s attempts at post-conviction relief failed until, 20 years after his conviction, the Tenth Circuit held in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 3:14 pm
Barr, 958 F.3d 969, 979–84 (10th Cir. 2020). [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 7:19 am
The leading case on that point is Murphy v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 2:34 pm
§ 201 et seq. [3] Murphy v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 1:37 pm
§ 201 et seq. [3] Murphy v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 6:36 am
City of Glens Falls, 908 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2018), a recent malicious prosecution case, did not repudiate the language in Murphy, which remains good law and binding precedent. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:46 pm
In Screws v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
For example, Murphy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:58 am
³ See, Murphy v. [read post]
