Search for: "Murphy v. Delaware"
Results 41 - 60
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2021, 9:31 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff V. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Professor Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
MURPHY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY—USA, A DELAWARE CORPORATION v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Therefore, assuming that a consumer protection claim could otherwise be brought for such damages (requiring more research than we care to do), if it involved a product, the claim could not exist because the product liability statute would subsume it.DelawareIt doesn't look like personal injuries are recoverable under the Delaware consumer protection statute, although we've only found trial court opinions on point. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions: all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:22 am
Loewy’s article Why Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 11:44 am
The relatively recent expansion of sports betting in the U.S. is a result of the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:26 am
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
Multiple plaintiffs filed suit against two Delaware companies in Delaware state court. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:15 am
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:01 pm
Beyer is cited in the following case: Weed v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
What he’s referring to is the Supreme Court’s 1942 opinion, written by Justice Frank Murphy, in Chaplinksy v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:51 am
Murphy, 296 Or. 610, 678 P.2d 1210, 1218 (1984) (Oregon abolishes the fireman’s rule at common law). [read post]
