Search for: "Murphy v. Director of Public Works"
Results 41 - 60
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2010, 4:17 am
V. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Murphy, 126 S.W. 343, 345 (Tex. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:33 am
Murphy, director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
One case that comes to mind is Mehraban v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:27 am
Gayle, which contains documents resulting from a Federal court suit that challenged segregation within Montgomery, Alabama’s public transportation system, and Williams V. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Coast Guard; Michael Murphy, the deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs; and Marie Mak, the director for contracting and national security acquisitions at the Government Accountability Office. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:28 am
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am
Rather, in Wilson v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
The CJEU in Svensson (C-466/12) ruled that a clickable hyperlink (as well as a framing link) to an authorised and publicly available work does not infringe the communication to the public right, because the public is not new. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 7:12 am
The Act also codified the Supreme Court’s holding in Alexander v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
Hall, was employed as Director of Employee Health Service at the Veterans hospital where Doe worked. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
Director of Codex and John Nay, Codex Affiliate and Founder & CEO of Norm.ai As the infamous lawyer that used ChatGPT to draft his brief made headline news,[1] serious attention was brought to the use and integration of emerging large language model (LLM) technology for legal work. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Nieves v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
Jury - http://bit.ly/SParA8 (Dan Levine) Apple v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
Elia Bols was a director of AMS Marketing Limited, a telephone marketing company incorporated in January 2016. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:00 pm
O’Callaghan [1966] IR 501) and “there is no form of imprisonment for preventative detention” (People (The Director of Public Prosecutions) v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Laurin said Erin Murphy's book, Inside the Cell: The Dark Side of Forensic DNA is "burning a hole in my desk" for wont of reading. [read post]
